As the world awaits with anticipation and anxiety for the upcoming summit between President Donald Trump and North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un, South Korea’s President Moon Jae-in has sent conflicting signals to the United States. Doubts have now been raised whether Moon’s left-leaning administration is committed to keeping U.S. troops in the Korean Peninsula and supporting U.S. efforts for disarming a nuclearized Kim regime.
The controversy started last week when Moon Chung-in, a Yonsei University professor and a special adviser to the South Korean president for Unification, Foreign, and National Security Affairs published an article in Foreign Affairs in which he wrote that U.S. military forces in South Korea would probably not be needed anymore once a peace treaty is signed.
The U.S. military presence is a highly sensitive topic both in terms of South Korea’s domestic politics and also its alliance with the United States. While a significant segment among the left wing of South Korea’s domestic politics desires a reduction or removal, President Moon Jae-in, who is from a left-leaning party, still publicly supports the stationing of U.S. troops in the country.
The uproar over the article was such that Moon Chung-in soon backtracked from the statement and said that he still supports the U.S. troop presence. South Korea’s Blue House also had to dispatch its national security adviser Chung Eui-Yong to the United States, who then met with his U.S. counterpart, John Bolton, on May 4 and publicly rejected the talk of a possible reduction of U.S. troops.
Chung’s visit, however, ironically coincided with a trip by Moon Chung-in to the United States. Despite insisting that he’s not speaking in any official capacity nor representing the Blue House’s views, Moon’s title as a “special adviser” and the fact that he’s a close friend to President Moon Jae-in means that his speeches in the United States were followed closely by Korean and international media.
At a May 4 forum at the Atlantic Council in Washington D.C., Moon again touted partisan rhetoric and warned that the responsibility is on Trump to make sure the upcoming meeting with North Korean dictator Kim Jong-Un “works.”
“If President Trump does not make the summit successful, then inter-Korean relations will go back to its original position again,” said Moon Chung-in. “I hope the President [Trump] will make the summit successful, so that we can go together toward peace and stability and prosperity on the Korean peninsula.”
Moon’s remarks are in sharp contrast to South Korea’s official diplomatic stance, which supports the U.S. position that North Korea must commit to denuclearization first in order for a peace treaty to come to fulfillment.
“Peace and stability in East Asia depend on North Korea’s complete denuclearization. We hope that U.S.-North Korea summit will be a concrete step toward such aspiration,“ said Cho Yoon-je, ambassador of South Korea to the United States, on May 7 at an event at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington.
Observers say that Moon’s statement is indicative of the views of many among the political left in South Korea, who downplay the North Korean regime’s aggression, while at the same time treating the U.S. alliance as an obstacle in the country’s attempt to reconcile with the North.
“Prof. Moon is obviously putting the onus of returning to subsidizing Kim Jong Un while the dictator lies and continues to advance his nuclear posture review on Trump; that is, Trump had better give Kim whatever he calls for, otherwise the summit will be a failure and Kim will return to his old ‘paranoid’ ways of threatening nuclear war,” said Sung-Yoon Lee, a Korean Studies professor at The Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University.
Moon Chung-in, an outspoken voice of South Korea’s political left, is no stranger to controversy and has several times ignited a furor with remarks he made in the United States. In June 2017, for instance, he suggested that a U.S. aircraft carrier should be “kept away” from the Korean Peninsula so as to reduce tension with North Korea’s Kim regime.
Moon’s title of “special adviser” to the President is an honorific that comes with no official power and earns him no payment from the government except for his travel costs. Still, observers question whether President Moon Jae-in’s appointing such a controversial adviser is a political signal that the Blue House wishes to send out.
“If he still holds the position as a senior adviser to the President, I would assume so,” said Victor Cha, a Korea expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, in response to a question about whether the controversial professor actually speaks on behalf of President Moon.
U.S. diplomats and military planners such as Defense Secretary James Mattis have repeatedly said that “there is no wedge” between the United States and South Korea and that the security alliance between the two countries, which are tied by a mutual defense treaty signed in 1953, remains strong.
From The Epoch Times